- Male
- 31 Years
- 22/01/2025
Hey, I was diagnosed with mild mitral valve regurgitation prolapse back in 2010 and took medication for a couple of years. I had a follow-up in 2014 and was told everything was fine and there was nothing to worry about moving forward. Should I still be going for consultations, or is it fine if I don't? Just thinking about whether I need to keep up with any checks or if it's okay not to.
Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors
yes .cardiac opinion once a year.
Dr. Dr Khaleel Suggests...
Consult a Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeon
Answered 04/07/2025
0
0
Ask Apollo
AI powered Health Chatbot
-
Consultations: Yes, continue regular follow-ups with a cardiologist. Even if past evaluations were fine, periodic checks are essential to monitor any changes.
-
Monitoring: Schedule an echocardiogram every 1-2 years or as advised by your doctor to assess the valve's condition.
-
Symptoms: Report any new symptoms like shortness of breath, fatigue, or palpitations immediately to your healthcare provider.
-
Lifestyle: Maintain a heart-healthy lifestyle, including regular exercise, a balanced diet, and avoiding smoking.
Recommended next steps
Consult a Cardiologist
Answered 20/08/2025
0
0
More Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery Health Queries
View allIs aortic valve replacement with a tissue valve safe for someone over 70 my dad's doctor suggested it but I'm worried about risks at his age
The risk of experiencing complications is generally higher for older people and those in generally poor health. Possible problems include: Infection – there's a risk of wound infections, lung infections, bladder infections and heart valve infections (endocarditis). You may be given antibiotics to reduce this risk.
Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors
My uncle's dealing with some heart blockages and is being advised to undergo this new MICS technique heart surgery at Apollo Bangalore by Dr. Sathyaki Nambala. He's a bit uneasy about it since this is a newer technique and he's anxious about the results. I couldn't find many reviews or info online, so I thought I'd check here to see if any doctors could share some insights. What are the risks involved, and is there anything specific he should be concerned about? Should he just stick with this new procedure, or go with the traditional method? Would love any advice or thoughts you might have.
In the case of your uncle's heart blockages, the Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (MICS) technique is a modern approach that offers several benefits compared to traditional open-heart surgery. The MICS technique involves smaller incisions, reduced pain, faster recovery time, and lower risk of infection. However, as with any surgical procedure, there are risks involved. Some potential risks of MICS heart surgery include bleeding, infection, damage to surrounding tissues, and the need for additional procedures. It's important for your uncle to discuss these risks with Dr. Sathyaki Nambala and understand the specific risks based on his individual health condition. In terms of concerns, your uncle should be aware of the learning curve associated with newer techniques like MICS. While Dr. Sathyaki Nambala is experienced in this technique, there may be a slight increase in operative time during the initial learning phase. Your uncle should also inquire about the success rates of MICS at Apollo Bangalore and discuss any concerns he may have with Dr. Sathyaki Nambala. Ultimately, the decision to proceed with the new MICS technique or opt for the conventional method should be based on a thorough discussion between your uncle and his healthcare team. Considering the potential benefits and risks, as well as your uncle's individual health status, Dr. Sathyaki Nambala will be able to provide personalized guidance on the most suitable approach for your uncle's heart blockages treatment.
Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors
My mom had a mitral valve replacement about two and a half years ago. Now the doctor is saying there's vegetation on the mitral valve again, and she might need surgery. In the surgical procedure, will they remove the vegetation, or do they replace the mitral valve again? Are there any risks the second time around?
In the surgical procedure for vegetation on the mitral valve, the approach depends on various factors such as the size of the vegetation, extent of valve damage, and presence of any complications. In some cases, the vegetation can be removed through a procedure called vegetation excision. However, if the valve is significantly damaged or if there are complications, a mitral valve replacement may be necessary. For a second-time surgery on the mitral valve, there are potential complications to consider, such as increased risk of infection, bleeding, blood clots, and damage to surrounding structures. It is important for the medical team to carefully assess the risks and benefits of the surgery in your mother's case. The specific medications and dosages prescribed will depend on the individual case and should be determined by the treating medical team.
Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors
Health Articles for you
View all
Disclaimer: Answers on Apollo 247 are not intended to replace your doctor advice. Always seek help of a professional doctor in case of an medical emergency or ailment.