apollo
  • female
  • 25 Years
  • 29/01/2025

I'm looking at my widal test results and I'm a bit worried. The values are showing Salmonella Typhi O Antigen at 140 and Salmonella Typhi H Antigen also at 140. Salmonella Paratyphi AH and BH Antigens are both at 120. Does this mean the test is negative? And if so, does that rule out typhoid completely or is there still a chance it could develop later?

Doctor 1

Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors

negative or low-level result indicating no active typhoid infection at this time

Dr. Mubarak Suggests...

Consult a Infectious Disease specialist

Answered 04/07/2025

0

0

Sick? Talk to a doctor now

More Infectious Disease Health Queries

View all

I've been worried about a recent encounter I had with a sex worker. We had a mouth-to-mouth kiss and there was probably some saliva exchanged. I also licked her breasts a couple of times, but there was no lactation. I haven't had any dental problems either, so I'm just wondering if there's any chance I could contract HIV from this situation. There wasn't any other sexual contact, like oral, vaginal, or anal sex involved. Could you shed some light on this for me?

The risk of HIV transmission through oral sex with a man is very low because the mouth is an unfriendly environment for HIV. Saliva contains enzymes that break down the virus and the mucous membranes in the mouth are more protective than anal or vaginal tissue

read more
Doctor 1Doctor 2

Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors

I'm experiencing frequent fevers over the past three months and I'm unsure which blood test I should takeCBC or a blood culture. I noticed that there are different subsections within blood culture tests. Could you help me figure out what to do?

-If you've been having frequent fevers for the past 3 months, start with a **CBC** to check for infection or inflammation. A **blood culture** is recommended if there's a suspicion of a persistent bacterial or fungal infectionit identifies the specific

read more
Doctor 1Doctor 2

Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors

I've been really worried about the window period for HIV testing. I got tested after 140 days, and my result came back non-reactive. I'm wondering if that means Im definitely in the clear, or if there's a more accurate test I should consider for better peace of mind. Could you shed some light on the best test option for HIV detection?

The window period for HIV testing varies depending on the type of test used, ranging from 10 to 90 days. For a non-reactive result after 140 days, it's likely that the test has detected the absence of HIV antibodies and antigens, indicating a negative status. The best test for HIV detection is the 4th generation antibodyantigen test, which can detect 99% of samples within 45 days. However, if you're still concerned, consider a nucleic acid test (NAT), which can detect HIV within 10-33 days.

read more
Doctor 1Doctor 2

Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors

Disclaimer: Answers on Apollo 247 are not intended to replace your doctor advice. Always seek help of a professional doctor in case of an medical emergency or ailment.